The company is also using anonymous information culled from its users to provide free access to a radiation map, powered by Google Maps, that makes radiation exposure levels publicly available to users worldwide.
The app can either be purchased from the BlackBerry App World or Android Market for $9.99, or users can get the app for free if they agree to accept mobile advertisements. The iPhone app for jailbroken devices is free and does not include advertisements.
If you really want to convince us you know so much about the topic you should stop trying to convince us that sound is radiation.
Worthy of continuing research? Sure. Worthy of being concerned about? Not really. Theres so many health risks (like diet) that people just dismiss out of hand that it always amazes me that stuff like this gets people worked up.
Mark, life has risks. Wearing your seatbelt in the car will do more to protect your life than anything you can do to protect yourself from the radio waves from your cell phone. Note that I said radio waves instead of the more inflammatory radiation. Have you wondered why news outlets and those with politica agendas choose to use radiation to describe radio waves? While its a correct use of the term (sound waves radiate from their sources too) they make money by spreading fear and what word is better for that? Makes you wonder, doesnt it?
Good luck altho I hope you dont need it.
According to the FTC,金利来皮鞋井儿街发觉无名男尸 寻觅知情者. there is no scientific proof that these shields significantly reduce RF radiation exposure from cell phones. The agency warns that some of the shield products that claim to block radiation from the earpiece or another part of the phone can interfere with the phones voice signal, which may cause the device to use even more power to communicate with cell phone towers. And this could lead to the cell phone emitting even more radiation.
We would never tell people to stop using their cell phones. But when you drive a car, you put on your safety belt. When you are trying to get to a healthy weight to prevent illnesses like heart disease, you count calories.
WE R DOOMD
The Tawkon app supposedly monitors the SAR level and alerts users when it gets above a certain limit. To be honest, I dont know how accurate the Tawkon application is. There are a lot of ctors that go into calculating the SAR level of a phone at any given moment. But the company claims its application uses an algorithm that measures your SAR by using the phones GPS technology and accelerometers to gauge the position and proximity of the device to the body to determine the amount of radiation thats being absorbed by the person using the phone.
Are children at an increased risk for cell phone radiation exposure and its effects?
As for microwaves, the same can be said of a microwave oven.
Nanotech – The Circuits Blog
As a result, all this nonsense is in the news again.
Previously, the WHO had said there was not enough evidence to even suggest a link between cell phone use and cancer. So the recent news is a departure from the previous stance. And it may spur governments and other groups to change their recommendations for cell phone use and safety. So r, neither the Federal Food and Drug Administration nor the FCC here in the U.S. have changed their recommendations.
Theres no harm in disclosing the SAR value, said Henry Lai, a researcher at the University of Washington, who has published several studies and has peer-reviewed several more studies on the effects of electromagnetic radiation. It may not be particularly meaningful, but the point is that it gives people a choice, and it gets them thinking about other ways they can reduce their exposure.
Ive seen advertisements for cell phone radiation shields that supposedly block cell phones from emitting radiation. Do these shields work?
Thx again for your great articles. I hope you can respond to these questions soon, as Im sure other cell phone users may be wondering about the same things.
Oh, well, we all feel soooo much better now that youve said that, being a well-read expert and all. Perhaps you should have just said this: I dont want to worry about this, Im happy to just take my chances. Anyway, brain tumors are so easy to fix, right? Cant I just take some pills and then theyll just shrink and go away?
Digital Media
In the U.S., meanwhile, efforts to require warning labels or requirements to provide more information about the SAR of a particular phone at the point of sale have so r been largely unsuccessful. Check out CNET Reviews editor Kent Germansrecent story that surveys the current state of cell phone radiation warning legislation.
A metallic foil shield roughly the size and shape of your head, when worn properly, can block close to 100% of low frequency electromagnetic radiation from interacting with the protected region of your body.
Yeah, x-rays are just EM radiation too. Perhaps you would like to have your head jammed in an x-ray machine for a few days?
Yeah, and Im sure sticking your head into a MICROWAVE oven is not dangerous at all either. Sound waves are vibrations of the air at audio frequencies. RADIATION is electromagnetic or particle based and, other than the ct they both have wavelengths and frequencies, are nothing like audio radiation (sound). I would go so r as to say it is incorrect to call sound radiation. A rt can radiate outward, but its not radiation. You could have electromagnetic radiation at audio frequencies but that doesnt make it sound.
Thats like saying we shouldnt be afraid of guns because the bullets are just made of soft lead.
So assuming that the way it measures SAR is accurate, the Tawkon application could provide you with more information about when and where your phone is likely to emit more radiation, and then it allows you to decide how you will change your behavior to minimize exposure.
Regulatory scrutiny alone is a test for GoogleAs trustbusters ratchet up the pressure on Google, the Web giant may be challenged to pursue as aggressive a corporate strategy as it historically has.
User manuals from most cell phones suggest keeping the phone a certain distance from your head rather than pressed up against your ear. The iPhone 4 manual says: When using iPhone near your body for voice calls or for wireless data transmission over a cellular network, keep iPhone at least 15 mm (5/8 inch) away from the body, and only use carrying cases, belt clips, or holders that do not have metal parts and that maintain at least 15 mm (5/8 inch) separation between iPhone and the body.
What about the app from Tawkon that was mentioned earlier in this article? Is that app useful in reducing radiation exposure?
Some researchers have suggested that children might be more likely to suffer from memory loss, sleeping disorders, and headaches as a result of cell phone radiation exposure, as well as be at increased risk of some cancers later in life. Several countries, including Russia, Germany, France, Israel, Finland, and the United Kingdom, have issued warnings against children using cell phones.
Mark
The Federal Trade Commission, the nations consumer protection agency, says that manucturer claims regarding so-called shields are mostly baseless.
Send me a copy of this message Note: Your e-mail address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the e-mail and in case of transmission error. Neither your address nor the recipientss address will be used for any other purpose.
Kind regards,
Trying to explain it away as its just radio waves doesnt do the trick, since those same radio waves in the proper setting could fry your brain in about 30 seconds.
Guys, the problem is much more serious than we think. As I know, some time ago, in 70th, one russian scientist conducted a number of experiments with extremely low level of microwave radiation comparable with thermal noise level and found that such radiation can affect both negatively and positively on human body if some parameters of microwave radiation (frequency, phase, amplitude etc. ) will match similar parameters of micro cells of the body and create so-called coherent effect widely used in laser technology. So, you could imagine what could happen with your body if this body will became a sef-destructive microwave gun
A group of bureaucrats recently announced that they recommend a warning for cell phones even though there is no scientific data to back it up.
Many people have interpreted this as a warning from Apple about keeping the device a certain distance from your body. But the disclosure is written that way because that is how the cell phones are actually tested.
poo yu?
Im sure there are some people who might advocate that you should not use a cell phone at all. But in todays world, thats not really practical. And its probably unnecessary, especially when there are ways you can reduce exposure. For example, automobile accidents kill more people every year than many diseases do, but nobody has suggested that people stop driving theircars. Instead, the government requires safety standards, like air bags, and drivers take safety precautions, such as wearing seat belts. Consumers can also take precautions to minimize the risk associated with cell phones.
This week, CNETs Maggie Reardon tackles the quandry of whether you should hold out for the next iPhone or jump on Verizons unlimited plan before it disappears.
I agree. We have to wait and see. Those people calling it fud now could be eating their words in 10 or 20 years. People used to think smoking wasnt bad for you either. Hell, doctors would prescribe smoking for people trying to lose weight. Whos laughing now? Certainly not those people who died from smoking. Do we see those doctors lining up and apologizing for suggesting they smoke?
The Digital Home
An inside look at the testing of Windows Phone 7In part three of a behind-the-scenes look at the development of Microsofts new phone software, Ina Fried takes a look at Redmonds massive testing operation.
Induced coherency effects from tuned low level microwave radiation + Felis catus = LASER CATS
Good health!
Yes, really.
After reading the comments up to this one, I am saddened to see such denial and a thorough lack of current scientific knowledge so prevalent on low-level RF microwave (non-ionizing radiation) effects. While I do understand cell phones have become ubiquitous (96% of the US population owns them today, with over 5B in use worldwide), that doesnt mean that the science of eventually determining how harmful they actually are wont ever catch up. In ct, the science _has_ caught up and they are not as safe as everyone posting here obviously thinks.
So should I avoid using a cell phone?
I believe Ms. Reardon forgot wear your tinfoil hat. The 13-country Interphone study found no increased cancer risk overall even in the heaviest cell phone users, with only a weak, non-causal link to /possible/ increased glioma risk. Yawn. Wake me up when theres something beyond FUD and clickbait headlines (not just at CNET, but across the web)…
roundup Like Microsoft and IBM before it, Google clearly looms large over a technological domain–in this case, the Web. The question many in government are now asking is, does it have too much power?
First of all, the idea of a shield is ridiculous. Any shield that would actually keep the wavelengths away from your head would also block them from carrying a signal. At worst youll have a phone with no reception, and at best youll have a phone with no reception on one side of it. As the article states, you could even have a case where the cell phone just cranks up the power to restore reception, so youll wind up with just as much radiation getting through and a lower battery life to boot.
Stephen Hawking and zombie Albert Einstein could issue a joint statement that cell phones can be harmful and it still wouldnt satisfy people.
Dont worry…I highly doubt youll get cancer from your cellphone.
Whats the real meaning of the World Health Organizations recent report that cell phones may cause cancer?
loricnet: Getting retweeted is like walking up to the Demon of External Validation and poking him in the eye.
&149;Use the speaker phone function of the cell phone. For the same reason youd use a headset, using a speaker phone is another good option. It keeps the cell phone away from your body, and you dont have to worry about using a headset. Of course, the downside is that everyone around you will hear your conversation, so this may only be something you do when youre at home or somewhere private.
Many experts believe that if risks exist owing to cell phone radiation, children will likely be affected more than adults. There are a couple of reasons for this. For one, children today are likely to begin using cell phones at a much younger age than their parents did, which means they will be exposed to this low-power radiation for a much longer period of time over their lifespan than todays adults.
However, go ahead and duct tape a cellphone to your head. Well be sure to check in 20 years to see if your brain has turned to mush. Personally, Ill stick with short conversations or hands free for longer ones. Better to err on the side of safety.
And because the amount of radiation a phone emits can download aol 9 0 optimize nowchange, the FCC SAR value is not really that meaningful. Still, some experts say that looking at the SAR value of a phone is a good starting place for consumers concerned about cell phone radiation exposure.
and yu dont psea manytang dong widt pee,
You mentioned the SAR values assigned by the FCC. Should I be looking for a phone with a lower SAR if Im concerned about reducing my exposure to cell phone radiation?
Again, invest just 1/2 hour of reading time tonight and you may just form a different–and more cautious–perspective on cell phone radiation exposure.
Third, correlation does not automatically equal causation. Weve been through this before with power lines. People claimed, with alleged statistical evidence, that living under/near high voltage power lines caused cancer. Turns out, the lower income nature of those properties resulted in a demographic that was also ripe with other risks from lead paint (at the time the studies were conducted) to drinking/smoking, hazards from profession, and all sorts of other such environmental ctors that grossly outweighed the power line claim.
Laugh at this issue at your own risk. Tin foil hat jokes are just displaying a lack of _current_ knowledge. After all, its always easier to just rattle off 20-year old non-heating RF exposure is 100% safe quotes. That is old, outdated news. BTW, the wireless industry sincerely appreciates your light of all this. And to those who figure that its safe until their own government issues warnings, good luck with that. Many European and other developed countries around the world have already done so; too bad the U.S. government is so r behind (reason? try tax revenues for size).
Mergatroid, smoking LIGHTLY is not bad for you anymore than anything else it. It is the HEAVY smokers, much like the HEAVY eaters and other heavy-X category people who usually have extreme problems.
Yes, intelligent informed people are _really_ concerned and doing the smart thing and limiting their exposure.
Google axes PowerMeter–a bad sign for others?Googles decision to unplug home electricity-monitoring application PowerMeter is a sign of how difficult it has been for home energy apps to catch on.
How many PhDs on this board today?
Are people really afraid of radiation from their cellphones? These studies were based on no new evidence, just a re-enterprition of existing studies.
There is NO HARM in being cautious. There COULD BE harm in laughing it all off. Do yourself a vor and use a headset for those long conversations..
nidopal: Spent the day in Brentwood, CA, wearing a tie. Putting on a T-shirt and jeans now and going to the Mission!
The moral to this story? Always listen to anonymous people on the Internet because they always know more about it than the professionals do……not.
The app also provides an in-home or office map that lets users predict where radiation would be the lowest and highest, based on their individual usage. The idea is that given this information, consumers can choose to use their mobile phones in areas where radiation is the lowest, or they can reduce exposure in areas with more radiation by using a headset. The app also provides personal statistics based on usage that give wireless subscribers an indication of how much radiation theyve likely been exposed to during the last call, day, week, month, or six months.
cell phone radiation was the talk of the town 8 years ago. Did everyone forget,or is this something that is going to pop up once a decade until proven or dis proven.
Marguerite Reardon has been covering the telecom beat for more than a decade and knows more about wireless and IP networking than she cares to admit. She has been a senior writer for CNET News since 2003, covering all things wireless and broadband related from iPhone launches to major telephone company mergers to IPTV developments. She often appears as an expert on news networks, including CNBC, MSNBC, NPR, and the BBC. Maggie loves visiting CNETs headquarters in San Francisco, but shes an East Coaster at heart, living and working in Manhattan.
Crave
All those people trying (too hard) to convince us that theres nothing to this cellphone/radiation issue have not done ANY research, and are trying to convince us that the few people who have are wrong even though they have done some research vs the nothing the naysayers have done.
In the testing procedures the FCC uses to certify that cell phones dont exceed the 1.6 watts per kilogram SAR limit, the commission chose to test the phones at a distance of between 0.59 inches and 0.98 inches (1.5cm to 2.5cm) from the body. It also tests the devices in a body-worn configuration and specifies that this should be done with the device in a belt clip or holster. If a belt clip or holster was not supplied with the phone, the FCC has told testers to assume a separation distance of between 0.59 inches and 0.98 inches (1.5 cm to 2.5 cm) during a test.
Hi, Marguerite. I enjoyed reading this article as well as the 2 previous articles regarding cell phone radiation. I just have a couple of questions that Id appreciate if you could please respond to:
1) For protecting ones self from exposure to cell phone radiation, what about the anti-radiation cases made by Pong Research ( Are these cases being dismissed just like the so-called shields mentioned in the article? Ive read up quite a bit on them on the internet and tests appear to confirm their effectiveness. But on average, these cases cost around $50 each, which is a lot of money to pay for a cell phone case. Do you think these cases are worthwhile and ultimately effective in diverting the cell phone radiation from ones body? Or should we the consumers look at these Pong anti-radiation cases as nothing more than a gimmick?
According to WHO it was a group of scientists, not bureaucrats. And, personally, Id take their word over the word of some anonymous person on the Internet.
Tawkon radiation alert.
A group of bureaucrats recently announced that they recommend a warning for cell phones even though there is no scientific data to back it up.
I want to look at this as trolling but Ive seen so many genuinely ridiculous comments about stuff like this that I just cant be 100% sure.
The FCC has said on its Web site that consumers shouldnt use the SAR value to compare the safety of cell phones. It maintains that all phones sold in the U.S. must test below the 1.6 watts per kilogram limit, and that therefore all phones that have made it to market are safe.
Chatter picks up for Sandy Bridge MacBook Air New MacBook Air sporting a Sandy Bridge processor and a high-speed Thunderbolt connector is headed toward mass production, report says.
Technically Incorrect
loricnet: RT @torrentfreak: LulzSec / Anonymous Scare Aussie ISP into Killing Internet Filter
If you believe this comment is offensive or violates theCNETs Site Terms of Use, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the comment). Once reported, our staff will be notified and the comment will be reviewed.
What precautions can I take to reduce exposure to cell phone radiation?
In other words, the FCCs testing protocol does not test for phones that are broadcasting at full power while inside your pants pocket or pushed up against your ear, two of the most likely ways cell phones are actually used.
brian_tong: McDonalds Frozen Strawberry Lemonade delivers the goods. Ill be coming back!
Your entire last paragraph is still debatable. And personally I would look at the last sentence as just FUD itself. Plenty of people who are not low income have similar complaints. How convenient of them to only test a demograph with supposedly built in 2ndary causes. However, last time I checked drinking/smoking and other risks are not just applicable to low income people. It must have been a pretty old study if lead paint was still on the walls. But Im sure only low income people used lead paint when it was still being used.
Last week, a division of the WHOclassified cell phones as a possible carcinogen. This means that though no definite link has been established between cell phone use and some forms of cancer, theres enough evidence that the group believes more research is needed. Other possible carcinogens, according to the WHO, include lead, exhaust from gasoline engines 校园微博, chloroform, and coffee.
Ive heard device makers warn that cell phones shouldnt be held too close to your head. Is this true?
&149;Avoid using your cell phone in places where you get a poor signal. Many consumers also dont realize that cell phones emit different amounts of radiation depending on where they are with respect to a wireless operators cell phone tower. Cell phones are constantly communicating with cell phone towers, but the further away the subscriber is from the cell tower, the weaker the signal. In order to connect to the cell tower, the device must boost its power, which increases the amount of radiation emitted. This means that if you get poor reception in your basement, you should move upstairs to your living room, where you have better reception, to talk on your cell phone. Tawkons Friedlander noted that a minute of talk time in a red zone, where the radiation is likely higher because of a poor cell phone signal, is equivalent to the amount of exposure youd get talking on the phone for three hours in a green zone, where reception is good and the radiation emitted from a cell phone is much less.
At first, I simply directed her toCNETs Quick Guide: Cell phone radiation levels, which shows the specific absorption rate, or SAR level, for some of the most popular cell phones on the market. SAR is the rate at which your whole body absorbs energy from a radio-frequency (RF) magnetic field. Every model of cell phone sold in the U.S. is tested and certified by the Federal Communications Commission to ensure it has a SAR value less than 1.6 watts per kilogram.
The author Marguerite has done an excellent job listing many things you can do to minimize cell phone radiation (RF microwave) exposure. Good job.
Im still waiting for a comprehensive self-defense guide for junk science.
The FCC has established a protocol for testing cell phones, and after each model is tested its assigned an SAR value. This value, which must be below 1.6 watts per kilogram over a mass weighing 1 gram, is supposed to represent the maximum amount of radiation that this phone can produce under the most stringent conditions.
the glory of AirplaneMode i always use it on iPhone 4… I only use cellphone calls for emergency or planned calls, otherwise i turn it off via Airplane Mode. Limit the times you cook your hand and brain, notice they never mention your HANDS, the part of you that is holding the phone is the closest and getting fried the most… makes me not want to even use a cellphone, my brain is feeling a bit overcooked today… i wonder why?
There is new evidence that shows definitively that cell phones cause increased brain activity. Whether that could result in health effects has not been proven but there is now no question that cell phones do have an effect on the human body. If they keep discovering new pieces of information like this every eight years you can bet the topic will continue to come back up. Remember, it took over a hundred years before studies started to prove cigarettes were dangerous and another few decades after that before people believed it. That is not to say that cell phones are dangerous – we are still in the who knows stages, but it is worth taking precautions.
Ill remember that next time I hear anything religious in the news.
b1g1nj4p4n: RT @scottmccloud: Please Read. Please RT. Please Give: via @neilhimself srsly, if you support the 1A, help is needed
&149;Dont put your cell phone right next to your body. Moving a cell phone even an inch from the body can greatly reduce radiation exposure. Signal strength lls off as the square of the distance to the source. This means that if you double the distance to the source, which is the cell phone to your head, the signal strength would be four times less, since two squared is four. If you triple the distance, the signal strength would be nine times less, and so on. At 10 times the distance between the cell phone and your head, the signal strength is 100 times less, and at 100 times the distance, it would be 10,000 times less.
Tawkon initially released its app for Research In Motions BlackBerry operating system. And now it offers the app for the GoogleAndroid OS. The company submitted its app to the iPhone App Store, but it was rejected. However, iPhone customers can still use the app if they jailbreak their phone and get the app through Cydia, a software application for iOS devices that lets a user find and download software for jailbroken iPhones, iPod Touches, and iPads.
Add your own personal message: (Optional)
We would never tell people to stop using their cell phones, said Gil Friedlander, co-founder and CEO ofTawkon, which makes a smartphone app that monitors cell phone radiation exposure and alerts people when the exposure is likely high. But when you drive a car, you put on your safety belt. When you are trying to get to a healthy weight to prevent illnesses like heart disease, you count calories.
Green Tech
Editors note: This is the third of a three-part series on issues related to cell phone radiation. RevisitTuesdays story on the inconclusive state of research on cell phone radiation, andThursdays story about the trouble with federal safety standards, orclick here for a roundup of related coverage.
Ive had a cell phone in one form or another since 1997
Seriously, though radiation from cell phones is non-ionizing and non-penetrating. The only known interaction with the human body for radiation in that part of the electromagnetic spectrum is essentially heating (like a really low powered microwave oven). So, at this point, its not even known how radiation from cell phones would cause cancer much less whether or not they actually do so.
Really?
danackerman: Who had the bright idea of totally closing off 6th Ave at 23rd St. for a street ir? Trafficmagedon!!!
2) I have an iPhone 4 (and I previously had an iPhone 3G). As such, I use my iPhone more than just talking on the phone (Im really not much of a phone person). I use my iPhone mainly for checking Twitter and e-mail, surfing the internet, playing games, etc. And so most of the time when Im using my iPhone (like right now in typing up this comment), I have the bottom of the iPhone pressed against my stomach while I type. So by pressing my iPhone against my stomach in this way, I assume Im also absorbing radiation into my body, correct? (even though Im not pressing my iPhone against my ear to talk on the phone). Other people who use their cell phones for texting, checking e-mail, playing games also may be pressing their cell phones against their bodies as a result. So should we be concerned about this, or is the concern (cancer) only applicable if our cell phones are pressed against our heads, where the radiation could affect our brains? (the stomach, for example, is not within close proximity to our brains like our heads are).
&149;Turn your cell phone off when you are not using it. For example, turn off your phone when you go to sleep at night. Or at the very least turn off the cellular radio in your phone. Many smartphones, such as theiPhone, allow you to put your phone in airplane mode. This shuts down the cellular radio portion of your phone. You can also turn off the Wi-Fi radio, too, just to be safe.
Bidnt tank ho….(esnuff ed)
Too bad that Cnet is propagating this FUD.
And secondly, children have smaller heads and thinner skulls than adults. And as a result, radiation is believed to penetrate more deeply into children than adults. Whats more, cell phones may have a greater effect on childrens brains because their brains are still developing.
This is an issue solved by psychology. When people are ced with the prospect that something that they have been doing for years is dangerous, its much easier to pretend that something is not dangerous than it is to change your lifestyle (q.v. smoking, st food, alcohol, drugs). People dont want to believe that there is any danger in cell phones, so theyll just ignore the mounting evidence.
Given the current testing guidelines, its hard to say whether cell phones sold in the U.S. would exceed 1.6 watts per kilogram if they were in a pocket or against your ear. But officials at the FCC have said that there is enough of a cushion built in to the current standard that they believe that all cell phones in the U.S. are safe.
Because the application must be tested and calibrated for each individual piece of hardware, it is not yet available for every BlackBerry or Android device. So potential users should check Tawkons Web site for device availability.
As a result, all this nonsense is in the news again.
The posting of advertisements, pronity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review ourTerms of Use.
&149;Keep conversations short. The less you talk on your cell phone, the less exposure to radiation you will have. So by keeping voice conversations short, youre limiting your exposure.
&149;Carry your cell phone in your purse or backpack instead of in your pocket. Again, its all about creating distance between you and your cell phone. So if you carry your phone away from your body, then you are reducing your exposure.
Doctor, how could I have brain cancer?, Did you over-use your cellphone without using a head set?, Well, yeah, but this guy on CNET said it was OK. He said what little data they had to that date was FUD, Well, perhaps he would be willing to help pay for your radiation treatments then. Fat chance.
loricnet: just discovered my phone has been autocorrecting FYI as dying. Dear friends I am not dying. I am just trying to inform you.
&149;Use a headset. Experts recommend using either a wired headset or a Bluetooth headset. While you may still be exposed to some radiation using either type of headset, its still a lot less than holding the phone to your ear. If you do use a Bluetooth headset, Id recommend taking it out of your ear when youre not using it. Theres no need to continue to expose yourself to low levels of electromagnetic radiation when you dont need to, since we still dont know the long-term effects of radiation exposure at these low levels.
Nanosys promises better color in tablets, TVsCompany says its technology can enable LCD displays to output 50 percent more color than they currently do.
This week in Crave: The wrinkle-free editionThis week, we sorted through more than the usual share of Apple rumors, pretended to be working while we were really on Facebook, and worried that our smartphones are our necks look bad.
But as I started working on this CNET special report on cell phone radiation, I realized that the FCCs SAR limit is not enough to help concerned consumers limit exposure. As I mentioned last week in the second installment of this special report,The trouble with the cell phone radiation standard, the studies on which these limits are based are outdated. Also, cell phone radiation levels vary depending on the strength of the wireless signal the phones are receiving. And the amount of radiation to which you could be exposed is dependent on how close the phone is to your body. Even holding the phone a few centimeters from your head can greatly reduce the amount of radiation you could be exposing yourself to.
Geek Gestalt
Most often it is to prevent unwanted EM from leaking out of the device and causing interference (sound miliar?) to other devices. In spite of this shielding, they still perform their functions. Very often now there will be a ground plane in a multilayer circuit board that, in effect, acts as a shield. So, in all likelihood, these cellphones already have a type of shielding in them.
Second, even the studies that claim to have evidence havent been able to show any beyond what would be a reasonable margin of error from environmental effects.
Really? Are people really afraid of radiation from their cellphones? These studies were based on no new evidence, just a re-enterprition of existing studies. Dont worry…I highly doubt youll get cancer from your cellphone.
To help readers figure out their best options for reducing exposure to cell phone radiation and to answer other questions related to protecting oneself, CNET has put together this FAQ.
Beyond Binary
No, these studies are not a reinterpretation. Where in the world did you get that idea?
Besides, lead causing medical problems is all just a bunch of fud too, right? At least, until its not. Oh, wait. Research proved it was….hmmm…maybe we should give them time to research the cellphone issues? NO? Just call it fud now without any further research? What the hell, it will only affect low income people, right?
b1g1nj4p4n: RT @cshirky: David Eagleman: Neuroscience is eroding free will as a legal concept
If you care about your long term health and more importantly the health of your children, I suggest you do some research for yourself. Ill suggest ONE website (a non-profit UK group) that is packed with the actual science of EMF health effects via substantial independently-funded studies: Theres a Science and Evidence section that is packed with cts and a long list of studies that show more than just a casual correlation of health and DNA/chromosome effects with extended low-level microwave exposure.
Marguerite Reardon has been a CNET News reporter since 2004, covering cell phone services, broadband, citywide Wi-Fi, the Net neutrality debate, as well as the ongoing consolidation of the phone companies.
Google good news: Nevadas yes to driverless cars The state of Nevada passes a bill that requests its Department of Transportation to create rules and regulations that will allow driverless cars on Nevadas roads.
I will stick with my own opinion on this, which is (as Ive already said) to err on the side of caution and use a headset or handsfree for my phone if I use it for any conversations over 5 minutes.
download aolCell phone radiation: A self-defense guide (FAQ,When my sister–a mother of four–was shopping for a new cell phone last summer, she wanted to know: whats the safest cell phone in terms of radiation?
Inside the Eiffel Towers secret bunkerRoad Trip 2011: Most people only go up the Eiffel Tower. But those in the know can arrange a visit to the military bunker located just adjacent and below the towers south pillar. CNET got a look.
&149;Text, IM, or use the Net more than talking on your phone. When youre texting or using your phone to access the Internet, you arent holding it up to your head the same way you would if you were talking on it. So texting and using other forms of communication that dont require you to put the phone to your head or right next to your body are good ways to reduce exposure.
The key here is long-term effects: brain cancer takes at least a decade to develop, so in the US, we still dont know the true effects. The only other long term study was performed in Sweden and other northern European countries, where people there have used cell phones since the early 90s (the US really started using heavily in the late 90s). The study did show increase glioma, but since it was started back in 1974, they did not correlate to cell phone use. The download aolCell phone radiation: A self-defense guide (FAQpoint is, following these European countries for increased occurrences of brain cancer will be interesting, since they have used cell phones 7-10 years before we did in the US.
If you have a question or comment for Marguerite Reardon, you can submit it here. However, because our editors and writers receive hundreds of requests, we cannot tell you when you may receive a response.
That would depend on where the shield is located and where is the most prominent spot for the radiation to be exiting the phone. Plenty of RF devices have built in shielding without it affecting their reception.
Comments